Several years ago we were vacationing with a group of friends in the mountains. Some of our friends had children at the time; we had a dog. We were sitting on the porch discussing the fatal load of “stuff” that seems to creep into every home beginning the moment a child is born and ending…well, never. Pack ‘n Plays. Wipes Warmers. Bouncy Seats. Swings. Stuff. I tried my best to remain silent, painfully aware that my dog ownership — despite its unbelievably taxing demands on our family — hardly qualified us to have an opinion on the topic. When the topic turned to the amount of, and highly-specialized nature of, toys available to kids these days, I felt I could, at last, have some say. Had I not been a kid once? Had I not played with toys once?
“It’s all marketing. Kids don’t need black and white mobiles at 1.3 months of age, followed by soft-and-scratchy toys at 2.4 months of age, followed by whatever developmental toy is deemed to be necessary at the next stage of growth. Kids are resilient AND smart. Sure, they need stimulation, but pots, pans and Tupperware can do wonders.”
I was met with silence. One woman, finally, spoke up.
“You’re wrong, Kristy. Wrong.”
“Really? Seriously? Look at you. You’re a well-functioning adult. We all are. And I seriously doubt you had a black and white mobile dangling over your crib at 1 month. Do you think you suffered for it?”
Again, silence. And then, “Yes, actually I do. I think my mother could have done a better job selecting toys for me at different ages of my life. I hope to do that better job for my own kids.”
I shut up, and went back to being a mere dog owner. I didn’t agree with her, but I wouldn’t let what I perceived as her own emotional hang-ups color my beliefs. I wasn’t going to be the one worrying about what toys I handed my children, fearing long-term repercussions on their well-being should I make the wrong choice, but, if she wanted to be that kind of mom, so be it.
And when my child was born a year later? A black and white mobile hung from her crib.
Of course, it didn’t, really. (A mobile perfectly coordinated with her room decor did.) But, figuratively, that black-and-white mobile dangled above her crib single-handedly forming nerve paths and boosting IQ points well into her toddler-hood. For all intents and purposes, my daughter ended up with all the developmentally - appropriate - or - is - it - really - a - marketing - scam toys she could have wanted.
So much for my conviction. Sort of. I hadn’t pulled a 180 as much as I’d simply seen the other side of the story. Every time I dangled one of those Einsteinian toys in front of her, I felt both ridiculous and positively “MOMMY!” at the same time. I was stimulating her growth! I was a marketing executive’s fool! In reality, things were probably somewhere smack in the middle of the pendulum, but my beliefs sat squarely on the pendulum, swinging from one side of the matter to the other. Entirely ambivalent.
Flash forward nearly four years.
During a chance encounter with, essentially, a complete stranger, the question of my “employment” came up.
“I stay at home with my kids,” I answered.
“You’ve made the best choice. Absolutely, the best choice.”
What was intended to be encouragement and an “atta-boy” struck me, instead, as unbelievably arrogant and self-righteous. I thought to myself, “Really? Just how is it the ‘best choice’? How could he possibly know?” I wasn’t offended as much by the fact that he’d unwittingly insulted the choice I’d made just two years earlier (I’d continued to work from the time my daughter was born until the time my son was born — only then had I decided to stay at home), as much as I was offended by the fact that he felt so sure about my current choice. I, myself, having had the experience on “both sides of the fence”, could clearly see advantages and disadvantages to both sides, and, simply, couldn’t be as sure about my choice as he was, apparently, for me. I’m not saying I think I’ve made the wrong choice in staying at home, I’m simply stating I can’t so easily, completely, and confidently endorse my choice at the expense of the other option. Again, entirely ambivalent.
My ambivalence on so many parenting issues isn’t a manifestation of any lack of confidence; it’s decidedly not an indicator of second-guessing my own decisions. Instead, I believe my ambivalence has at its root my ability to consider — and respect — the many sides of any issue. It’s more than a matter of respectfully ceding personal decisions to their rightful owners; it’s a matter of truly empathizing with more than one side of so many issues.
It all sounds so respectful and mature, this empathetic ambivalence of mine. But, really, a good dose of strong conviction would do me no harm. Conviction can be convenient, and not speciously so. It can be a salve upon your worries, a reassurance to your concerns. Conviction can be a sturdy boat in a stormy sea of questions. Stand upon your convictions, and you stand tall. Ambivalence isn’t such solid ground. Often I find myself seeking terra firma, but never — quite — getting there. Knowing where I stand? A noble pursuit. Too bad I must cross middle ground in my noble journey. I’m, too often, caught in its quicksand.
Yesterday afternoon, as I pondered this issue in my head (and on my keyboard), I watched my kids play together, entirely contented. For a moment, I had no desire to interject myself into their play — they were self-assured and happy. Moments later? I wondered whether I should get down on the floor and more fully engage myself with them. Tupperware vs. Einsteinian Toys. The debate rages on…
Perhaps I should return to the days of mere dog ownership. It was far more convenient.