The other day, our entire family went to see Merlin and the Cave of Dreams at the Raleigh Little Theater. We head to this theater about four times a year and enjoy their family series together with my sister and her family. Always, afterward, a pizza dinner at Amedeo’s. This? Is the stuff I love about being a family.
The production was no different than any other production we’ve seen: clever scenery, rich costuming, and acting that leaves only a little to be desired. My children sat intently with their jaws wide open watching the wonders on the stage; I sat intently with my jaws wide open watching them watch the play.
And then Arthur met Uther in the Underworld. Swords clashed, spears jabbed, and dragons hurled fire. Thunder clapped, lights flashed, and men screamed. I watched as Zoe recoiled in horror and fear. And I recoiled in horror and fear as I watched Evan creep to the edge of his seat in awe.
I’ve tried my best to limit my children’s exposure to violence. Television is extremely limited in our home, and that which they watch is usually on PBS. Toy guns are not allowed in our home, and physical play usually emphasizes skill over brawn.
And yet? Evan can make a gun out of anything. He shoots bad guys and spears villians daily. The word kill is not unknown to him. And, more often than not, he comes home from school covered head-to-toe in mulch, undoubtedly from a few good tackles and romps on the playground.
When Zoe began displaying stereo-typical “girl” behaviors — playing dress-up, obsessing over princesses, and oogling grandma’s make-up — my reaction was a less-than-concerned eye-roll. Certainly, this jeans-and-t-shirt kind of gal didn’t impose these behaviors upon her, but they were entirely innocent, and only a bit annoying.
So why isn’t my reaction to Evan’s display of stereo-typical “boy” behaviors anything other than that same bored eyeroll? Why, instead, the arched eyebrow of concern and frantic rush to stifle the behaviors?
A girlfriend of mine, and mom to three boys, says that there’s recent research (which I haven’t bothered to investigate) indicating that young boys should be allowed to play out such behaviors now, in their early years. By the time they get to be teenagers — when they have decidedly less impulse control — these behaviors are nothing interesting, nothing exotic, and nothing to be explored. They’re old hat, quite frankly. The rule in her house goes something like this: play with the swords and shooters as much as you want, preferably going after the bad guys. But if anyone gets hurt, the “toy” goes away. Seems reasonable to me. Guns and swords and shooters as therapeutic play? I’m not so certain I can go so far as to say that, but her point does resonate with me — a bit.
And then I watch my son pick up a stick and “shoot” me with it. And it’s…uncomfortable. It’s uncomfortable because I cannot abide guns. I cannot abide the violence they bring, and the hate they brew, and the discord they percolate. It’s uncomfortable because … it is real. Zoe’s fantasies are just that: fantasy. There are no real-life corollaries to unicorns and princesses in towers and magic carpets. Evan’s games, too, are certainly fantasy. He hasn’t any idea that what he plays in his games indeed has a very real, and very disturbing, corollary in true life. But it does.
One day, Zoe will discover that there really aren’t any unicorns and magic carpets. She’ll be sad for a day or two. Discovering that your fantasy isn’t really real can be devastating. Yet, I wish it could happen to Evan. A tear or two shed upon learning that his fantasy world of bad guys and villians and shooters is just that — fantasy — would be entirely worth the peace brought by the alternate reality.